Portland metro single-family market—Q3 2025 in under 60 seconds:
CODA
Are you an agent in Portland and wonder why appraisers always do “x”?
A homeowner with questions about appraiser methodology?
If so, feel free to reach out—I enjoy connecting with market participants across Portland and the surrounding counties, and am always happy to help where I can.
And if you’re in need of appraisal services in Portland or anywhere in the Portland Region, we’d be glad to assist.
Oregon’s 9.5% rent cap for 2026 combines with Portland’s relocation assistance rules, creating distinct valuation considerations for rental properties across the metro area.
When I appraise 2–4 unit residential income properties in the Portland metro area for estate, trust, or probate purposes, the single largest value depressant is almost always a long-term tenant paying far below-market rent. Oregon’s statewide rent-stabilization law and Portland’s additional relocation-assistance requirements combine to make it expensive and slow for heirs to reset those rents after the original landlord passes away.
Oregon law limits rent increases to once every 12 months and caps the allowable increase at 7% plus the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with an overall hard cap of 10%. For calendar year 2026, this limit is 9.5%. Certain units—such as regulated affordable housing and buildings less than 15 years old—are exempt. No-cause evictions are prohibited after the tenant’s first year of occupancy.
Many inheritors lack the cash or desire to front relocation fees and perform renovations, so the low-rent tenancy often remains in place for years. (I go into more detail in my discussion of Oregon rent control laws and the overlays the City of Portland adds.)
In the income approach for 2–4 unit residential properties, appraisers derive a gross rent multiplier (GRM) by dividing comparable sales prices by their monthly (or annual) scheduled rents, typically resulting in a three-digit figure (e.g., 165–195 in most Portland metro submarkets at present). Appraisers may also cross-check conclusions with a direct capitalization approach when income and expense data are reliable.
That GRM is then applied to the subject property’s actual contract rent. When contract rent lags 20–40% behind market—a common range in inherited portfolios— the indicated value is often proportionally lower than the same property delivered vacant or at market rent.
Example: A duplex with market rent of $2,700 per side ($5,400/month total, $64,800/year) but current contract rent of $2,000 per side ($4,000/month total, $48,000/year) and a reconciled GRM of 180 yields:
For a real-world illustration, consider a recent North Portland fourplex sale from 2024. This 1966-built property sold for $768,000 with actual gross scheduled income of $58,026 annually ($4,835 monthly average across four 2-bedroom units on month-to-month leases). The listing projected $66,120 in gross income—a 14% increase—highlighting below-market rents with “opportunity for growth.” Using the market-derived monthly GRM of approximately 159 (consistent with the listing’s implied metrics), the contract-rent value aligns with the sale price, while the projected rents suggest a potential value around $875,000, representing a 12–14% discount due to the existing tenancies and regulatory hurdles to realizing that upside.
RMLS multifamily listings display scheduled rents in the public fields, and confidential remarks may note “long-term tenants – below-market rents” as an upfront acknowledgement to a potential purchaser. Savvy buyers and appraisers run the numbers immediately and adjust offers (and appraised values) accordingly.
| Regulatory Scenario | Duplex (Owner-Occupied) | Triplex / Fourplex |
| State Law Termination (Owner Move-In) | Allowed (with 90-day notice) | Allowed (with 90-day notice) |
| Portland Relocation Fee Required? | NO (Exempt under PCC 30.01.085.G.3) | YES (Full fees apply) |
| Cost to Recoup 1 Unit | Minimal (Time/Legal fees) | $4,200 – $4,500+ (plus legal fees) |
Inherited small income properties with long-term, below-market tenants routinely trade at meaningful discounts to physically identical buildings that are vacant or leased at market rates. The regulatory environment creates a durable “locked-in tenancy discount” that survives the death of the original landlord.
Appraisers must document both contract and market rent, then apply the market-derived GRM to the realistic income stream the property actually produces under current law. Understanding this dynamic early avoids surprise when the date-of-death value comes in lower than expected.
In many cases, keeping the stable tenant and modest cash flow is the path of least resistance—and still the highest and best use. Rents can be gradually raised each year until all units are in alignment with the rest of the market, provided increases comply with the annual cap and notice requirements; in Portland, certain increases trigger relocation assistance.
If you are an estate planning attorney, personal representative, or heir handling a 2–4 unit rental in Multnomah, Washington, Clackamas, Yamhill, Columbia, or Hood River counties, reach out. These scenarios are a routine part of my practice.
Thanks for reading—I hope you found a useful insight or an unexpected nugget along the way. If you enjoyed the post, please consider subscribing for future updates.
Question: How have the current rent control laws affected your portfolio?
CODA
Are you an agent in Portland and wonder why appraisers always do “x”?
A homeowner with questions about multifamily income properties, GRMs, or income calculations?
If so, feel free to reach out—I enjoy connecting with market participants across Portland and the surrounding counties, and am always happy to help where I can.
And if you’re in need of appraisal services in Portland or anywhere in the Portland Region, we’d be glad to assist.
Oregon vs Washington rent cap and relocation rules create sharply different risk profiles for 1–4 unit (conventional) and 5+ unit (commercial) investors in the Portland and Vancouver metro areas.
In the Portland–Vancouver metro, rent regulations directly shape cash‑flow stability, refinance eligibility, and valuation. Appraisers rely on predictable rental streams for income approach comparables, while lenders model risk differently across state lines. For investors, the 4‑to‑5 unit threshold is pivotal: properties with 1–4 units typically qualify for conventional Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac financing, while 5+ unit buildings fall into commercial lending. Because rent‑cap rules and relocation‑assistance exposure diverge sharply at this threshold, understanding the cross‑border distinctions is critical before acquiring or refinancing multifamily assets.
| Issue | Oregon Statewide | Portland (overlay) | Wash. HB 1217 | Impact 1–4 Units | Impact 5+ Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-year increase allowed? | No | No | No | Same both states | Same both states |
| Rent cap (2025) | 7% + CPI ≤10% | Same statewide cap | ≤10% (5% Mobile/ Manufact. parks) | Effectively identical | Effectively identical |
| Relocation assistance required? | Only if landlord owns 5+ units | Yes on ≥10% increase or qualifying no-cause | None statewide | Portland exception | Oregon yes / WA no |
| New build exempt | 15 years | Same | 12 years | WA slightly shorter | WA slightly shorter |
| Owner-occupied 2–4 plex exempt? | No | Possible with PHB approval | Yes | WA more favorable | WA more favorable |
Thanks for reading—I hope you found a useful insight or an unexpected nugget along the way. If you enjoyed the post, please consider subscribing for future updates.
Question: Do you think other states will follow Oregon’s and Washington’s rent control laws?
CODA
Are you an agent in Portland and wonder why appraisers always do “x”?
A homeowner with questions about multifamily income properties, GRMs, or income calculations?
If so, feel free to reach out—I enjoy connecting with market participants across Portland and the surrounding counties, and am always happy to help where I can.
And if you’re in need of appraisal services in Portland or anywhere in the Portland Region, we’d be glad to assist.
As the Portland metro area navigates a shortened week of real estate developments, themes of cautious optimism in homebuying blend with tightening rental regulations and professional safeguards against bias. First-time buyers are edging back into the market, even as confidence dips slightly, while Oregon’s actions on rent pricing and unspent funds signal a push toward affordability. In the Portland–Vancouver region, these shifts underscore the need for appraisers and other real estate professionals to stay abreast of changes and the evolving valuation landscape.
The National Association of REALTORS®’ October 2025 REALTORS® Confidence Index reveals a notable uptick in first-time buyer activity across the Portland metro area, capturing 32% of transactions amid modestly lower interest rates and expanding inventory. This marks a shift from prior months, even as overall REALTORS® confidence tempered, with just 17% anticipating higher buyer traffic. Median days on market held steady at 34, while cash sales accounted for 29% of deals, homes drew an average of 2.1 offers, and 19% closed above list price.
For appraisers in the Portland region, these patterns point to steadier comparable sales pools, though they also flag potential risks from waived contingencies—19% of buyers skipped appraisals—and a strong tilt toward suburban purchases at 82%. This segmentation demands careful reporting, especially in areas like Multnomah County and Vancouver, WA, where defensible adjustments for local preferences become essential. The week’s buyer momentum sets a grounded tone, reminding professionals to measure market value without injecting undue optimism.
Oregon joined eight other states in proposing a $7 million settlement against Greystar Management Services for alleged misuse of RealPage software in coordinating rent hikes, affecting roughly 19,000 Portland apartments—equivalent to 10% of the region’s multifamily stock. If finalized, the agreement would prohibit Greystar from exchanging non-public rent data or following RealPage’s algorithmic suggestions, echoing a parallel U.S. Department of Justice decree limiting the software’s practices for three years. Such curbs could ease rental pressures starting in 2026, with appraisers watching for cap rate shifts in larger apartment complexes and steadier gross revenue forecasts.
In the Portland metro, this intervention highlights ongoing scrutiny of tech-driven pricing, potentially softening rents by 5–8% and delivering $110–$176 in monthly relief to affected households—translating to $4,000–$10,600 over three to five years. For income property valuations, the changes reinforce the importance of conservative income projections, particularly for smaller multifamily assets where GRMs might stabilize. This development folds into broader affordability efforts, bridging national antitrust moves with local tenant protections.
Starting January 1, 2026, Oregon mandates a one-time 7-hour continuing education course on Valuation Bias and Fair Housing for all licensed appraisers, followed by at least 4 hours in every two-year renewal cycle—without expanding the existing 28-hour total. Codified in OAR 161-010-0010, the requirement targets unconscious biases in comp selection, adjustments, and reporting to uphold USPAP’s call for credible, impartial analyses. In the Portland metro, this will likely yield more transparent reports, aiding homeowners, realtors, attorneys, and lenders in reviewing decisions on over-improved properties or reconsiderations of value.
Appraisers don’t generate market value—they document it—and this training bolsters accountability by encouraging explicit justification of valuation choices. For regional stakeholders, expect enhanced scrutiny on equitable practices, especially in diverse neighborhoods where bias could potentially skew outcomes. The measure ensures Portland professionals are in compliance with national appraiser ethical standards, fostering trust in an era of heightened regulatory focus.
A Portland city audit uncovered $21 million in uncollected or unallocated rental-registry fees earmarked for emergency aid and eviction prevention, despite monthly filings of 800 to 1,200 cases in Multnomah County. The shortfall stems from tracking lapses and delays, overlapping with the resignation of Portland Housing Bureau Director Helmi Hisserich, who departed with a $241,000 severance after administrative leave. Redeploying these funds could bolster tenant supports, indirectly stabilizing occupancy in rental properties across the Portland region.
For single- to four-unit residential appraisals, the revelation carries little direct valuation impact, though it amplifies persistent affordability strains. In multifamily commercial contexts, however, improved assistance might lower vacancy risks and lift net operating income, supporting firmer asset values. This episode underscores administrative hurdles in housing policy, urging appraisers to factor in such externalities when projecting long-term stability.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Q3 2025 House Price Index reports a subdued national uptick of 0.2% quarter-over-quarter and 2.2% year-over-year, while Oregon lagged with just 0.31% annual growth and a –0.16% quarterly dip, placing 45th among states. Within the Portland–Vancouver–Hillsboro MSA—spanning Clackamas, Columbia, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill counties in Oregon, plus Clark and Skamania in Washington—the purchase-only index edged up 0.16% quarterly and 1.51% annually, buoyed by Clark County’s momentum despite a –0.36% all-transactions quarterly pullback. Local medians (calculated by PortlandAppraisalBlog in the six-county Oregon-only region) held flat at $600,000, with unchanged sales volume and days on market climbing 13% to 52, mirroring the index’s conservative trajectory.
This repeat-sales methodology draws on conforming mortgages from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, integrating appraised values from refinances to ground the data—affirming appraisers’ pivotal role in shaping reliable benchmarks. In the Portland metro, the modest gains advocate for restrained adjustments, aligning with extended market times and steady comps. The report reinforces a narrative of equilibrium, where national moderation meets regional resilience.
Oregon’s 2026 rent increase limit stands at 9.5% for most residential rentals in the Portland metro, effective January 1 and pegged as the lower of 10% or 7% plus the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, West Region (All Items) from the prior year—easing from 10.0% in 2025. Governed by ORS 90.323, the cap covers single-family homes, apartments, and smaller multifamily units, exempting new leases, fixed terms, and larger complexes over 30 units (capped at 6% under ORS 90.600). Current medians hover at $1,987 for two-bedrooms per RentCafe and $1,772 overall via Zillow, with neighborhoods ranging $1,800–$2,400.
This predictability aids appraisers in forecasting income for rental conversions and multifamily holdings, benefiting homeowners, investors, realtors, and lenders alike. In a demand-heavy market, the adjustment tempers escalation while syncing with inflation, potentially steadying GRMs and occupancy assumptions. It caps a week of rental-focused reforms, offering a clearer lens for valuation in Oregon’s urban core.
This week’s briefs weave a tapestry of measured progress in the Portland real estate landscape—from invigorated first-time buyer shares to regulatory reins on rents and pricing algorithms. Rental affordability takes center stage with settlements, unspent funds, and a dialed-back cap, potentially easing pressures on multifamily valuations while the FHFA index signals subdued but steady price growth in the Portland–Vancouver MSA. Layered atop new anti-bias training, these elements highlight an industry honing its precision amid national headwinds, ensuring appraisals reflect a market that’s resilient yet restrained.
For professionals and stakeholders, the convergence underscores the value of localized insights: suburban demand bolsters entry-level comps, while policy tweaks demand vigilant income modeling. As 2025 draws to a close, the region positions itself for 2026 with tools for equitable, data-driven decisions.
Thanks for reading—I hope you found a useful insight or an unexpected nugget along the way. If you enjoyed the post, please consider subscribing for future updates.
Question: Which story interested you the most?
CODA
Are you an agent in Portland and wonder why appraisers always do “x”?
A homeowner with questions about appraiser methodology?
If so, feel free to reach out—I enjoy connecting with market participants across Portland and the surrounding counties, and am always happy to help where I can.
And if you’re in need of appraisal services in Portland or anywhere in the Portland Region, we’d be glad to assist.
Oregon’s 9.5% rent cap for 2026 combines with Portland’s relocation assistance rules, creating distinct valuation considerations for rental properties across the metro area.
Oregon’s statewide rent stabilization framework under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act provides a uniform baseline for rental increases and evictions across the state, including the Portland metro area. Oregon was the first U.S. state to enact comprehensive statewide rent control in 2019 (via Senate Bill 608), followed by California later that year (via AB 1482) and Washington in May 2025 (via HB 1217). These statutes establish annual limits on rent increases for most residential properties, with exemptions for new construction and certain subsidized housing. However, within the city limits of Portland, local ordinances add layers of tenant protections that require relocation assistance for certain terminations and rent hikes. As a certified residential appraiser serving homeowners, lenders, realtors, estate planners, and attorneys in the region, understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate property valuations, especially for income-producing rentals where regulatory constraints directly influence projected cash flows and market discounts.
Key provisions include rent increase limits under ORS 90.323 and their annual calculation under ORS 90.324.
Under ORS 90.323, landlords cannot raise rent during the first year of tenancy or more than once every 12 months thereafter. The maximum allowable increase for calendar year 2026 is capped at 9.5%. Violations expose landlords to liability for three months’ rent plus actual damages.
Just-cause eviction requirements under ORS 90.427 prohibit no-cause terminations after the first year. Qualifying landlord reasons (major remodel, owner/family move-in, etc.) still require proper notice and, in some cases, one month’s rent as assistance. Exemptions from these protections include units less than 15 years old from the date of the certificate of occupancy, federally subsidized or regulated affordable housing (where the tenant’s portion does not rise or the increase is program-mandated), owner-occupied duplexes or triplexes (where the landlord resides in one unit), and certain short-term rentals.
Portland builds on these state protections through City Code 30.01.085 – the Renter Additional Protections ordinance. The city applies Oregon’s statewide cap but adds relocation assistance obligations when rent increases reach 10% or more (for units otherwise exempt from the statewide cap, such as newer construction or subsidized housing). Relocation assistance is also required for:
Payments (due 45 days before termination or within 31 days of tenant request) are scaled by unit size:
Landlords must file exemption forms with the Portland Housing Bureau when applicable and notify the Bureau of payments within 30 days.
For estate planners and attorneys handling inherited rentals, these combined rules often lock in below-market tenancies. Homeowners converting properties to rentals must project income conservatively. Realtors listing income properties typically disclose scheduled rents via RMLS. A listed property with units significantly below market rent levels may receive low offers and usually sells at a substantial discount.
Lenders benefit from reduced turnover risk but must recognize higher operating costs inside Portland city limits. For appraisers, the dual framework means statewide rent caps set the ceiling, while Portland’s relocation obligations add another layer of financial consideration.
Oregon’s statewide rules apply in the Portland Region (Columbia, Clackamas, Hood River, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill Counties). Portland’s relocation overlay is city-specific. Properties in the Vancouver Region (Clark, Cowlitz, Klickitat, and Skamania Counties) fall under Washington’s separate statewide stabilization law (enacted May 2025), which exempts new construction for 10 years and caps annual increases at 7% + inflation, not to exceed 10%.
Thanks for reading—I hope you found a useful insight or an unexpected nugget along the way. If you enjoyed the post, please consider subscribing for future updates.
Question: Do you think other cities in Oregon will add relocation assistance provisions?
CODA
Are you an agent in Portland and wonder why appraisers always do “x”?
A homeowner with questions about multifamily income properties, GRMs, or income calculations?
If so, feel free to reach out—I enjoy connecting with market participants across Portland and the surrounding counties, and am always happy to help where I can.
And if you’re in need of appraisal services in Portland or anywhere in the Portland Region, we’d be glad to assist.
Portland Appraisal Blog 